And isn't available in any of the linked libraries available to me.
And I already had a long email discussion with Laurent back in 2011, about his comments on Steve McConnell's blog.
If I may make a suggestion, when the source material is likely to be unavailable, it might be better to quote the reasons given rather than the conclusions -- then we can try to follow the reasoning rather than having to take someone's conclusions at face value.
I don't understand what you're getting at here. Laurent's book (written after McConnell's blog) is available at http://leanpub.com/leprechauns . If you're unable or unwilling to figure that out, I suspect you're not really trying.
You're engaging in an asymmetric attack here--posting trivial statements that avoid the substance of my comments, but require me to do a lot of work to satisfy you. I've replied to your comments in good faith. Now the onus is on you.
I wasn't engaging in any kind-of attack, just making a suggestion.
You said -- "if you disagree, please read and rebut his work directly, not just these quotes" -- so, as I haven't read the book, I haven't tried to rebut those quotes.
And isn't available in any of the linked libraries available to me.
And I already had a long email discussion with Laurent back in 2011, about his comments on Steve McConnell's blog.
If I may make a suggestion, when the source material is likely to be unavailable, it might be better to quote the reasons given rather than the conclusions -- then we can try to follow the reasoning rather than having to take someone's conclusions at face value.