Isn't the point of the article that Iceland "let them fail" and things got better instead of worse?
If an individual goes bankrupt through poor decisions, we castigate them. When a financial institution does the same, there are often little or no consequences.
What's the incentive for them to improve their behavior?
If an individual goes bankrupt through poor decisions, we castigate them. When a financial institution does the same, there are often little or no consequences.
What's the incentive for them to improve their behavior?