> People love to cite drugs as being a case where patents work well. But patents are far from a perfect fit for this problem.
Bringing drugs in the discussion has more of a relative role than any absolute metric though. We could subsume the reasoning as such though:
- patents work better on drugs than on software by leaps and bounds
- patents are far from a perfect fit for drugs
- it follows that software patents are an atrocity of abysmal scale
Bringing drugs in the discussion has more of a relative role than any absolute metric though. We could subsume the reasoning as such though: