Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Do people who say that sort if thing work for a company that they believe is totally worthless? Work can still be valuable (to one's community even) if someone else is making money from it.

Sure, the value is just distributed the opposite of the way most people would like it to be. The vast majority of the benefits accrue to a practically random individual, some goes to the worker, and a tiny bit trickles to the community.

I would wager most people are far more interested in situations where the worker and community benefit greatly, and a tiny bit trickles to whoever owns the business.

Besides that, if you wanted to benefit your community there are much better and easier than ways than grinding away at work and being proud of the income tax you pay, I guess?



Yes, I'm sure a community without doctors or nurses or social workers or public defenders would be glad about all that retained value.


From the guidelines:

Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize.

----------

The vast majority are not doctors, nurses or public defenders. The vast majority work for private companies whose direct value to the local community is much less obvious, with the exception of paying people who (might?) live close by to the business.


please don't do this, it's the lowest form of rebuttal and is itself technically breaking the guidelines.


As far as I can tell there's nothing in the guidelines telling us not to mention them when someone's plainly in violation.

Plus I did actually include a refutation, which you've then ignored to make this complaint.


What's ironic is that you didn't respond to the strongest version of their argument.


The guidelines stipulate answering to the strongest version of their argument, I did that while staying true to real demographics. The guidelines notably do not stipulate I must respond to any argument someone makes by assuming every statement is true.

In the spirit of being kind and avoiding snark, that'l be the end of this chain :)


They also say to assume good faith.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: