Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Didn't read the links completely, but isn't this just a case of survivorship bias?

In 2011 maybe what he spotted was how human greed was going to make the whole thing skyrocket, but over-analyzing it made him think BTC is a solution for the future, etc, etc.



It was a pretty ballsy bet either way, and I could see it being reposted even if BTC had crashed and burned to $0 like many expected it to.

Meanwhile, we're still waiting for John McAfee to consume his reproductive organs on TV:

http://dickening.com/




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: