Fun to see this on the front page. I'm curious if ops intent was to share something cool is trigger a bunch of nostalgia because they definitely did the latter.
I remember using this when it first came out. It was a game changer for doing forensics back before full disk encryption was a common thing.
I frequently see things on HN where people just share the website of a well known project. I assume it's for people who legit never heard of it. Maybe they're younger. I think of a saying, every year a new generation discovers the Beatles for the first time.
Very nostalgic! I remember using this a few times around maybe 2005 when a Windows system got corrupted. Knoppix would boot from the CD and let you recover files from your HD. Loved it
Every generation in history has said the younger generation is lazy. Didn't make it true when I was a young xenial / millennial and I suspect it's not true for Gen Z and Gen Alpha either.
I hd to do a 4-bit version of this back in 2006 for my Computer Science undergrad. Interesting to see EE students doing it as well. Like many people here, we had to build it on actual breadboards. Which I think adds a ton to the experience.
> Looking at the other half of this complaint: cannot or will not?
This. I'm 40 and getting my MBA part time while working and being a parent and I can tell you even as an adult: when you hand me a 20 page case study I will read it but I'm going to be swearing under my breath the whole time.
In today's day and age reading anything long is asking a lot.
My daughter (10) routinely reads 400+ page books meant for kids older than her, but give her a 200 page book in class and she struggles with it even though it's a lower reading level because it is a chore.
What kind of college are you going to? I wasn't a humanities major, but had to take a lot of credit hours there. None of the readings were ever busy work. Now, I really didn't want to do them and I very much resented having to do credit work in the first place, granted. But in terms of the classes, none of the readings were ever pointless. If anything, we never had enough time to even do the readings that we really should have - the courses should have been longer. If you are seeing the readings as just busy assignments, you really need to talk with the professor and try to figure out if you're in the right class or not.
My undergrad was in computer science and my master's is a MBA. Both from good schools (think top 50 not top 5).
I was thinking more like text books. Text books authors are generally much more wordy than they need to be because the publishing industry and academia awards length. But with that said, I kind of disagree with you a bit on biz school work. I'd say a quarter of most HBR case studies are fluff. I don't mean throw 12 on the floor and 3 are fluff, I mean, take a 12 page case study and 3 of the pages are not adding value.
Articles are even worse because the pay is often by the word and there are min lengths to get into the print edition.
Speaking from experience. I actually wrote a book for a major publisher and the main metric that determined how much I got paid was page count. We had a page count decided before the first word outside of the proposal was written.
I was speaking about the assignment itself, not the writing therein.
Sure, you can throw out about 80 pages of War and Peace where he just blabs about soviet farming practices.
I'm not an MBA guy, so I can't speak to the curriculum in Biz Schools, but I can say that what you say does come across with most MBAs I have met. In that they think similarly about their education being about the networking and not really about the material.
Which is a shame really for both of our sides of this all.
I think you are saying that the publishers are essentially paying for minimum words / word count. Which is the opposite of what any writing upperdivision teacher would tell you about writing. And I'm saying that you are getting busy work assigned from the professor in the first place (and then saying that i haven't experienced that).
The solution is to have the students take charge of their education and be less passive. If the assignments are bad (in selection or in writing) then the student should challenge the teacher on it.
Yeah, that's a harder way to do things, yes, but I think anyone out of school for anytime will agree that it would be a better way.
Thank you for sharing you experience with me all the same.
First, colleges don't generally give loans. The lenders are not affiliated with the college.
Second, as with anything it is more complex than you are making it. For example, I've known people who have:
- Had a variable interest go up with little to no notice and no adjustment to the payments so if you're not paying attention month to month you end up underpaying.
- Been put in deferment without notice (so their payments stopped) and without requesting it, but continued to accumulate interest.
- Interest is sometimes compounding while in deferment or paying less than interest.
- Were mislead about how interest accumulated while they were still in school (i.e. lead to believe there was no interest when in reality there was just "no payments")
And in that last one in particular, the person I know in that situation (happened to be married to her now), it was her boomer parents that signed the loan paperwork and they didn't even give her access until after she graduated when she found out interest compounding that whole time.
I think the whole debate is putting too much on 17 kids and not enough on their parents who need to co-sign these documents. When I was that age the school didn't tell me how interest worked, my parents did.
I am not saying it is simple. And yes technically the lenders are separate but the incentives align them so the effect is the same as if they weren’t.
As examples:
- loans are given equally for an English major and an electrical engineer. No market force at play here.
- Interest rates are the same as well even though the risk of default is not the same across majors
- Your interest rate remains the same for subsequent years even if you get a 2.0 your first year.
- College tuition rises in lockstep with additional Federal grants and loan programs
Also, I am not saying there isn’t bad or unscrupulous behavior by lenders but the default case is poor money management and a faulty understanding of interest. I think this fault lies with the student, but also the government allowing its lenders and institutions to prey upon their youth as well as allowing high schools to graduate students without this basic understanding.
There is a lot of serious allegations in here. But some of these complaints apply to most SOC 2 compliance services. For example: it points out that Delve provides pre-filled documents and encourages you to accept them as is. In my experience that is typical. I have seen companies just rubber stamp pre-created documents that describe IT processes that do not accurately reflect actual policy because the MBA[1] running the project didn't want to pull in IT and had no idea what any of it meant.
[1] No offense to MBA, just using it as a placeholder for: business stakeholder with no IT background.
Giving you template device management policies is one thing, it's a whole other thing to say you don't have to have board meetings and generating fake minutes.
100%, accepting pre-generated board meeting notes is egregious. This whole thing is awful and I am in no way defending it. The opposite, I think other compliance as a service companies also need to be scrutinized as well.
If you aren't either having the minimal meetings or written consents per the requirements for the delaware C, something outside Delve's hands has gone off the rails...
Doesn't seem like a problem with SOC 2 compliance, seems like a problem where a company appointed someone who is not suited to handle a SOC 2 project.
As for the pre-filled stuff, that's what other SOC 2 companies mean when they try to sell you "compliance in a box." Not that bad if the company is starting from scratch (<1 year), but not realistic for a company that has an existing IT footprint.
However, the allegations here is that it is fraud. An "AI" company acting as a front for certification mills.
I was literally just attending a course on "innovation" and the topic of Apple vs Android was covered. Interestingly enough, a majority of students commenting cited iOS "security" as a core value proposition. As an Android user, however, I know there are a lot of CVEs in volume but in terms of severity, when an iOS issue happens it appears to generally be much more severe.
First I will say, I am very much against dark patterns and I believe servers should be paid a fair wage and not have to rely on tips.
But until that I do tip for dine-in service. But I found the "buy me a coffee" link on the button of this to be much funnier / ironic than it probably should have been.
It's also missing what I think is the worst dark pattern:
Having no option not to tip at all. Instead requiring that the customer press "Custom" and manually entering "0.00"
I remember using this when it first came out. It was a game changer for doing forensics back before full disk encryption was a common thing.