Instead of comparing GitHub stars, better check npm trends: https://npmcharts.com/compare/react,angular,@angular/core,vu...

AngularJS, Angular 2+, Vue.js... all have a somewhat similar approach. React is more of a newer paradigm, it fixes most of the problems older stacks had in a radically different way, yet elegant. This article fails to explain the different paradigms.

Also please stop "Want to use TypeScript? Go with Angular!". React and its ecosystem has the best TypeScript experience thanks to JSX. JSX being just JavaScript, everything is checked by TypeScript like any regular JavaScript piece of code. You cannot do that with HTML templates.

Did not known about Kea, seems nice! However, there are no unit tests??

They are in src/__tests__

Thx, didn't see them at first. Since i like to complain: continuous integration and code coverage with nice badges are missing ^^

Wow that is a good point! I have the same experience with Angular.js 1 and TypeScript.

Can someone confirm that you cannot type check Vue.js templates (without using Vue.js JSX support of course)?

I'm not a Vue user but I can't see how they would be type checkable without using JSX.

For the Angular 1 project, I'm thinking as a stepping stone we could introduce JSX templates before migrating to Vue or React later.

> OOXML-like rubber-stamping process

Compare Dart and Microsoft OOXML is unfare.

- OOXML implementation is not open source nor under BSD licence

- Poorly defined => 6546 pages vs 867 pages for ODF to achieve the same goal

- Given the huge amount of work Microsoft decided to go with... the fast track ISO procedure!

- Corruption of ISO members?

- ...

> how many of Darts [...] flaws have been fixed in ECMA [...]?

None yet, it is just the beginning of TC52.