I have looked for mosh support for a while and not found anything. It would drastically improve the connection experience in VSCode. My terminals never disconnect anymore, but the Code popups about your sessions needing to be restarted has drastically reduced my usage.

MOSH is not suitable for automated usage such as TRAMP, VSCode, sshfs, etc. It is only intended for interactive use.

They let you in and keep your property. I've never had an issue at a border, but I still keep my devices encrypted and powered off when crossing.

I have seen phrases with "earns its keep" a lot when comparing different algorithms and tradeoffs. "GLM-5.2 cost $21.90, worked overnight as instructed, and earned its keep twice."

I always assumed this was negotiated ahead of time with the county where they are operating, and police officers educated on what to do.

It used to be, and buying a few servers was a cheap way to get off the cloud (if you can manage them efficiently). But with RAM and other costs these days... I've had to rethink it a lot.

It's at worst ten times as expensive as it should be. But AWS was already ten to a hundred times as expensive, so even in the computer parts crisis, self hosting is still ahead.

I agree for personal projects, do you still think buying hardware makes sense for business use case at the current time?

It certainly looks at the commit history more than I ever have. I find it quite cool when it points out interesting hints from the history.

Same place (and only place) I've driven one. Easy stick shift, a bit underpowered for the more mountainous highways, but it was a good ride.

I guess life would be boring if we were all the same. I found the 1.0 litre turbo in the Sandero to be perfectly adequate in power. I hated almost everything else about the car though. And again, I don't usually have this problem, more often I fall in love with the little rental cars we get and start checking how much they are on the used market before remembering we have no need for a second car.

Ebay? A friend to ship it? I agree on the de-google part but putting graphene on a used pixel is aligned!

Absolutely, and it is irrational to refuse to buy hardware from Google (which, with Graphene, is under your control) when the alternative is to either run a Google OS on a third party phone (and give up control of the software), or Apple (equally bad), or some impractical and less secure alternative like a Linux phone incompatible with Android apps.

Agreed. I dislike most of Google's products, but their Pixels have secure hardware and are very open (compared to other modern smartphones). In short - a good product for people wanting to run free software on modern-ish smartphones. If a product is good, why not buy it?

Ended up here with the same problem, 200k output tokens burned on these errors after one prompt!

Is this any different than current search ads (as far as people ignoring them)? I think this is a lot better for Google. It's always at the top of the page, harder to block with an adblocker, possibly more trusted (we'll see...)