Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | avtar's commentslogin

Less distractions, yes, but mainly it's the size and e-ink display.


Not sure if you've looked into this but you can ditch Bell's router with one of these:

https://store.10gtek.com/1-25g-media-converter-sfp-slot-with...

Or a non-copper equivalent in your case. You just need to use the VLAN IDs that Bell expects, see https://www.reddit.com/r/bell/s/uUltTdyqFC


I did end up ditching the modem since I wrote the article. I ended up using a TP-Link 8411 router though. Having everything TP-Link has its benefits for observability and maintenance.


> Oddly enough, Google’s LLM is the only one that has been answering my questions well on a research project these last weeks.

Google Search declined in quality when results started containing more noise (more ads, SEO spam) that required sifting through. Gemini isn't displaying all that garbage.. yet.


Given the context, they're probably referring to epubs. Files could contain just generic malicious javascript or malware that attempts to exploit vulnerabilities in specific ereaders.


TBH that part of your landing page exhibits some confusing UX. Perhaps it's just me but when I see a UI image with a play button I assume that clicking it is going to play a video, not redirect me to a login page.


Got a link or more info regarding the theme?


I was thinking of breeze-gtk[0] but that's KDE-specific.

[0]: https://github.com/KDE/breeze-gtk


It’s literally the other way around - “GTK theme that looks like Qt”.


To be extremely pedantic, I never said it was a Qt theme :P

I said that Qt has a GTK theme. It doesn't, but KDE does have a GTK theme.


> and price seems to have gone down

They sent an email a couple months ago stating prices were increasing as of Mar 27. The family plan went from $59.88 USD per year to $71.88 But it's still worth it IMO.


Maybe Lemmy without federation?


This looks very promising! Thanks for the lead.


Please consider adding screenshots of the UI that provide an idea of what the experience will be like without having to log in using Bluesky or other credentials.


Done! Thanks for the suggestion, that's a good idea.


Thanks for the quick fix :) Nice to see more Discord alternatives these days.

A few other landing page issues if you feel like addressing them:

- Attempting to navigate with the Tab key results in tab order following nav elements once, where focus indicators aren't visible, and then the same elements get iterated over again but this time focus indicators are visible.

- Tab order doesn't include screenshots and jumps to the FAQ

- Clicking a thumbnail shows the larger image but without any elements for closing the overlay

- Pressing Esc doesn't close the overlay

- No skip links on any of the pages


I don't know how I can keep forgetting about keyboard users. Thanks for bringing this to my attention, I'm working on it!


I assume it looks the same as literally every other chat app


Yeah. Lots of discord-like free-software(as in freedom) chat apps are spawning. I think it's clear that whichever becomes the most popular will not be about who has better code but rather about who manages to get a stronger community around their project.


Nash.

There are always quirks and edges. Like using Bluesky itself, there's a number of viable apps for them (some better, some worse), they're all slightly different. There was a large number of Reddit apps, every single one very different.


This would be perfect with TLS. The docs don't make this clear...

> tailscale serve --service=svc:web-server --https=443 127.0.0.1:8080

> http://web-server.<tailnet-name>.ts.net:443/ > |-- proxy http://127.0.0.1:8080

> When you use the tailscale serve command with the HTTPS protocol, Tailscale automatically provisions a TLS certificate for your unique tailnet DNS name.

So is the certificate not valid? The 'Limitations' section doesn't mention anything about TLS either:

https://tailscale.com/docs/features/tailscale-services#limit...


I think maybe TLS would work if you were to go to https://service.yourts.net domain, but I've not tried that.


It works, I’m using tailscale services with https


Thanks for clarifying :) I'll try it out this weekend.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: